Settling a usage, punctuation or grammar question
Usage questions can require grammatical analysis, a dictionary, a style manual or evidence of actual use. These references answer different questions, and a disputed expression can be an established idiom or a matter of preference.
Dictionaries and actual usage
Dictionaries reflect changes in language rather than simply controlling them, so medical writers should keep abreast of changing definitions and new words. Figurative “literally”, used to strengthen a metaphor, appeared in nineteenth-century writing by Dickens and Louisa May Alcott and was included in an Oxford English Dictionary definition reported in 2013.
Absence from a dictionary does not establish that a term does not exist or is not widely understood. “Evaluable” can meet a need more economically than “capable of evaluation”; its use was documented from 1880 before its later dictionary admission.
Corpus searches can establish that a disputed construction is used. A search reported in 2015 of SpringerExemplar, containing more than nine million documents, found more than 117,000 articles matching “timepoint”, “time-point” or “time point”, with first use in 1953; about 115,000 were reported in medicine and public health, biomedicine, life sciences, oncology and general biochemistry. The count excluded regulatory documentation, where the term was also familiar in practice.
A search of the same database found more than 92,000 hits for “diagnosed with” and just under 17,000 for “was diagnosed in”. The vague search terms supported the conclusion that both formulations were common, rather than a judgement that one was correct and the other wrong.
Prepositions are especially dependent on idiom and place substantial demands on speakers, writers and translators when expressing fine relationships.
References for punctuation questions
Several reference works address different levels of punctuation guidance.
- Lynne Truss’s Eats, Shoots & Leaves offers a journalistic introduction through everyday examples, historical anecdotes and punctuation rules, suited to readers who avoid dry grammar textbooks.
- The Penguin Guide to Punctuation gives practical basic guidance on individual marks, with brief sections on abbreviations and capitalisation, and explains British and US differences without taking sides.
- The Chicago Manual of Style addresses more complex questions: commas with adverbial clauses and phrases, brackets and dashes, compound words and affixes, bulleted lists, quotations, and abbreviated names, titles and degrees.
- The AMA Manual of Style addresses medical-text details including table headings, words preceded by numerals, Greek letters or per cent signs, eponyms, and enumerations and bulleted lists.
The Chicago and AMA manuals provide guidance on controversial questions rather than universal truths.